Pattern of Cervical Cytology among Hormonal Contraceptive Users and Non-Users in University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Nigeria 

Main Article Content

Ebienju Walter Olaka
Okezie Chinedu Ugwa

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer remains a major public health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study assessed the prevalence and pattern of abnormal cervical smear results among hormonal contraceptive users and non-users attending the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH), Nigeria.


Methods: This cross-sectional analytic study was conducted at the Family Planning and Gynaecology/Cancer Screening Clinics of UPTH over 14 weeks. A total of 200 women were recruited, comprising 100 hormonal contraceptive users and 100 age- and parity-matched non-users. Hormonal contraceptive users were selected using systematic random sampling, while non-users were recruited from gynaecology and screening clinics. Following informed consent, Pap smears were reported according to the Bethesda 2014 classification. Data were analysed using SPSS version 23.0, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.


Results: Participants were aged 25–56 years, with a mean age of 39.34 years. Most participants were aged 36–45 years (52.5%) and multiparous (71%). Socio-demographic characteristics were comparable between groups. The prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology was 2.0% in both user and non-users with inflammatory changes (1.0%), LSIL (0.5%), and HSIL (0.5%) being the observed patterns. There is no statistical difference in the prevalence and pattern of cervical cytology between users and non-users of contraceptives.


Conclusion: This study shows very low prevalence of abnormal cervical smears among hormonal contraceptive users and non-users at UPTH. There is no significant association between hormonal contraceptive use and cervical abnormalities. The findings support the integration of cervical cancer screening into routine reproductive health services.

75 58

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Olaka, E. W., & Ugwa, O. C. (2026). Pattern of Cervical Cytology among Hormonal Contraceptive Users and Non-Users in University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Nigeria . The Nigerian Health Journal, 26(3), 1674 – 1680. https://doi.org/10.71637/tnhj.v26i3.1549

References

World Health Organization. Human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer. 2025. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-papillomavirus-%28hpv%29-and-cervical-cancer

World Health Organization. Cervical cancer. 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cervical-cancer

Lynette D. The prevention of cervical cancer in developing countries. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:1204–12.

Ezechi OC, Gab-Okafor CV, Ostergren P, Pettersson KO, Odberg Pettersson K. Willingness and acceptability of cervical cancer screening among HIV-positive Nigerian women. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:334. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-334

Kumar N, Gupta R, Gupta S. Glandular cell abnormalities in cervical cytology: what has changed in this decade and what has not? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;240:68–73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.06.012

Al-Zahrani AS, Ravichandran K. Cervical cancer screening with pattern of Pap smear: review of multicenter studies. Saudi Med J. 2007.

Andijany AA, Abdulhafeez DA, Fadag RB, Al Harbi AM, Alsahafi RA, Bin Abbas ES, et al. Prevalence of abnormal Pap smears in the western region of Saudi Arabia from 2010 to 2022. Cytojournal. 2023;20:44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_17_2023

Qasim KM, Alsulami SN, Aljuaid AE, Al-Mulhim MA. Prevalence and characteristics of abnormal Pap smear in central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2015.

Nayar R, Wilbur DC. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2015.

Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, Rodriguez AC, Wacholder S. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007;370(9590):890–907. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61416-0

World Health Organization. Comprehensive cervical cancer control: a guide to essential practice. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

Barış İİ, Keleş AN, et al. Abnormal cervical cytology risk factors in the Western Black Sea region and the importance of health insurance. Turk J Pathol. 2013.

Smith JS, Green J, Berrington de González A. Cervical cancer and use of hormonal contraceptives: a systematic review. Lancet. 2003;361(9364):1159–1167. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12686038/

Alkadri HM, Alghamdi AA, Alsharif AA. Pattern of abnormal cervical Pap smear in Western Saudi Arabia. J Cytol. 2014;31(2):85–89. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.138651

International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2012. Available from: https://monographs.iarc.who.int

Gupta S, Sodhani P, Halder K, Chachra KL, Singh V. Cervical cancer screening in resource-constrained settings: experience from an urban community-based study in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(7):4059–4063.

Singh S, Ezeanochie MC, Olagbuji BN. Prevalence and pattern of abnormal cervical cytology in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Niger J Clin Pract. 2012;15(4):424–428. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23235363/

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 168: cervical cancer screening and prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(4):e111–e130. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001708

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2018;320(7):674–686. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.10897

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.