Complications of Fracture and Dislocation Treatment By Traditional Bone Setters: A Private Practice Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60787/tnhj.v11i2.55Keywords:
Traditional bonesetters, Fractures, Dislocations, ComplicationsAbstract
Background: Traditional bone setting is common in developing nations. The principles of bone setting, although differing slightly among cultures are similar. The practice is not without its shortcomings as patients who have received prior traditional bonesetters (TBS) care usually present with complications to hospitals. This study seeks to document the complications seen as a result of TBS treatment of fractures and dislocations at a private ortho-trauma centre.
Methods : A prospective study of consecutive patients with fractures and dislocations who had received treatment from traditional bonesetters and were seen and managed afterwards at Rehoboth Specialist Hospital , Port Harcourt from 1st January 2007 to 31st December 2007 .
Results: During the study period, 71 patients were seen, consisting of 38 males and 33 females with a male to female ratio of 1.15:1. Their ages ranged from 4 years to 80 years with an average of 33.75 years. The most frequent age brackets were 20-29 years (32.39%) and 30-39 years (22.53%). Those with secondary and tertiary education constituted 81.69% of the total. More patients first consulted the TBS (63.38%) than orthodox practice (36.62%) after the injury. There were 74 fractures (86.05%) and 12 dislocations (13.95%) with more of the injuries occurring in the lower extremity. The most frequent aetiology was road traffic accidents, mostly motor-cycle related, followed by falls and sports injuries. Those who spent 4 months or more with the TBS before presentation constituted 69%. The most frequent complications were nonunion (36.47%) and malunion (24.71%) and both were associated with shortening in 31.76%. Other complications were chronic joint dislocation, ankylosis, joint stiffness, arthrosis/arthritis, chronic osteomyelitis, Volkmann's ischaemic contracture, osteonecrosis, neuropathy, limb gangrene, delayed union and pressure ulcer. The most frequent intervention was open reduction and internal fixation (60.56%) and most of the patients (78.87%) spent 4 weeks or less in the hospital. There was no mortality in this series.
Conclusion: Complications following treatment of fractures and dislocations by TBS are common. The common complications include non-union, malunion which were both associated with shortening as well as chronic joint dislocation, although the largely avoidable limb gangrene still occurred. There is a need for basic training of TBS for them to be integrated into the primary care system.
Downloads
References
Ekere AU. A review on the challenge of traditional bone setting to orthodox ortho/trauma practice in the developing world. The Nigerian Health Journal 2004; 4: 219-223.
Omololu AB, Ogunlade SO, Gopaldasani VK . The practice of traditional bonesetting . Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466:2392-2398 .
Green SA. Orthopaedic surgeons. Inheritors of tradition. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (363):258-263 .
Romer F. Remarks on manipulative surgery or bonesetting. Postgrad Med J 1926; 1: 110-115.
Hatipoglu S, Tatar K. The strengths and weaknesses ofTurkish bone-setters. World Health Forum 1995; 16: 203-205.
Udosen AM, Otei OO , Onuba O . Role of traditional bone setters in Africa: experience in Calabar , Nigeria . Ann Afr Med 2006; 5: 170-173.
Ikpeme IA, Udosen AM, Okereke-Okpa I. Patients' perception of traditional bone setting in Calabar . Port Harcourt Med J 2007; 1: 104-108.
Onuminya JE. The role of the traditional bonesetter in primary fracture care in Nigeria. S Afr Med J 2004; 94: 652-658.
Paul BD. The Mayan bonesetter as a sacred specialist. Ethnology 1976; 15: 77-81.
Nwadiaro HC, Nwadiaro PO, Kidmas RA. Principles oftraditional bone setting in the middle belt of Nigeria: a critical appraisal. Niger J Surg Res 2004; 6:114-118.
Ogunlusi JD, Okem IC, Oginni LM. Why patients patronize traditional bone setters. Internet J Orthop Surg 2007; 4(2).
Memon FA , Saeed G , Fazal B , Bhutto I , Laghari MA , Siddique KA , Shaikh AR . Complications of fracture treatment by traditional bone setters at Hyderabad. J Pak Orthop Assoc 2009; 21: 58-64 .
Unnikrishnan PM , Santhanakrishnan R , Parivallal T , Hafeel A . Traditional orthopaedic practices of southern India a pilot study . In : Balasubramanian AV , Devi TD , eds . Traditional knowledge systems of India and Sri Lanka . Papers presented at the COMPAS Asian Regional Workshop on Traditional knowledge systems and their current relevance and applications . 3-5 July 2006, Bangalore . COMPAS Series on Worldview and Sciences 5 . Chennai : Centre for Indian Knowledge Systems , September 2006 ; 148-155 .
Aries MJ , Joosten H , Wegdam HH , van der Geest S . Fracture treatment by bonesetters in central Ghana : patients explain their choices and experiences . Trop Med Int Health 2007; 12 :564-574 .
Eshete M . The prevention of traditional bone setter's gangrene . J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 : 102-103.
Umaru RH , Gali BM , Ali N . Role of inappropriate traditional splintage in limb amputation in Maiduguri , Nigeria . Ann Afr Med 2004; 3 :138-140 .
Oginni LM . The use of traditional fracture splint for bone setting . Niger Med Pract 1992; 24 :49-51.
Dada A , Giwa SO , Yinusa W , Ugbeye M , Gbadegesin S Complications of treatment of musculoskeletal injuries by bone setters . West Afr J Med 2009; 28 : 333-337 .
OlaOlorun DA , Oladiran IO , Adeniran A . Complications of fracture treatment by traditional bonesetters in southwest Nigeria . Fam Pract 2001; 18 : 635-637 .
Solagberu BA . Long bone fractures treated by traditional bonesetters : a study of patients' behaviour . Trop Doct 2005; 35 : 106-108 .
Nwadiaro HC , Nwadiaro PO , Kidmas AT ,Ozoilo KN . Outcome of traditional bone setting in the middle belt ofNigeria . Niger J Surg Res 2006; 8 : 44-48 .
Alonge TO , Dongo AE , Nottidge TE , Omololu AB , Ogunlade SO . Traditional bonesetters in south western Nigeria friends or foes ? West Afr J Med 2004; 23 : 81-84.
Peden M , Scurfield R , Sleet D , Mohan D , Hyder AA , Jarawan E , Mathers C (Eds) . World report on road traffic injury prevention . Geneva : World Health Organization , 2004 .
Onuminya JE . Performance of a trained traditional bonesetter in primary fracture care . S Afr Med J 2006; 96 : 320-322 .
Solomon L , Warwick D , Nayagam S . Apley's system ofthorthopaedics and fractures , 8 edition . London : Arnold , 2001 .
Sikorski JM . Understanding orthopaedics . London : Butterworths , 1986 .
Nwadiaro HC . Bone setters' gangrene . Niger J Med 2007; 16 : 8-10 .
Onuminya JE , Onabowale BO ,Obekpa PO , Ihezue CH . Traditional bone setter's gangrene . Int Orthop 1999; 23 : 111-112 .
Ofiaeli RO . Complications of methods of fracture treatment used by traditional healers : a report of three cases necessitating amputation at Ihiala , Nigeria . Trop Doct 1991; 21 : 182-183.
Nwankwo OE , Katchy AU . Limb gangrene following treatment of limb injury by traditional bone setter (TBS) : a report of 15 consecutive cases . Niger Postgrad Med J 2005; 12 : 57-60 .
Bickler SW , Sanno-Duanda B . Bone setter's gangrene . J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35 : 1431-1433 .
Garba ES , Deshi PJ . Traditional bone setting : a risk factor in limb amputation . East Afr Med J 1998; 75 : 553-555.
Onuminya JE ,Obekpa PO , Ihezue HC , Ukegbu ND , Onabowale BO . Major amputations in Nigeria : a plea to educate traditional bone setters . Trop Doct 2000; 30 : 133-135 .
Thanni LO , Tade AO . Extremity amputation in Nigeria a review of indications and mortality . Surgeon 2007; 5 : 213-218.
Strowbridge NF ,Ryan JM . Inappropriate traditional treatment resulting in limb amputation . J R Army Med Corps 1987; 133 : 171-174 .
Dogan A , Sungur I , Bilgic S , Uslu M , Atik B , Tan O , Ozgokce S , et al . [ Amputations in eastern Turkey (Van) : a multicenter epidemiological study ] . Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2008; 42 : 53-58 .
Udosen AM ,Ugare UG , Ekpo R . Generalized tetanus complicating lower limb fractures managed by traditional bone healers . Trop Doct 2005; 35 : 237-239
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Nigerian Health Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal is owned, published and copyrighted by the Nigerian Medical Association, River state Branch. The copyright of papers published are vested in the journal and the publisher. In line with our open access policy and the Creative Commons Attribution License policy authors are allowed to share their work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
TNHJ also supports open access archiving of articles published in the journal after three months of publication. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g, in institutional repositories or on their website) within the stated period, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). All requests for permission for open access archiving outside this period should be sent to the editor via email to editor@tnhjph.com.
