Awareness of the Violence Against Persons Prohibition Law and its Association with Female Genital Mutilation Prevalence among Youths in Oyigbo, Rivers State
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The study assessed the “awareness of violence against persons prohibition (VAPP) law and its association with prevalence of female genital mutilation among youths in Oyigbo, Rivers State, Nigeria.
Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 496 youths (15-24) years old. It employed a multistage sampling technique. Data was collected via a semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. Data analysis was done with SPSS version 27, using Pearson’s Chi-square test for statistical associations.
Results: The median age is 23 years, females; 387 (78.0 %) and 330 (66.5%) had secondary education. The awareness about female genital mutilation was 164 (33.1%), while the prevalence of FGC among female youths was 95 (24.5%), and 109 (22.0%) among all respondents. Only 88 (17.7%) were aware of the VAPP law. Age (χ2 = 12.97; p < 0.001), occupation (χ2 = 9.82; p < 0.019), marital status (χ2 = 32.27; p < 0.001) awareness of FGC (χ2 = 12.26; p < 0.001), and awareness of male circumcision (χ2 = 40.73; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with female genital cutting (FGC). Specifically, those who were married were 5.2 times more likely to have had FGC compared to those who were single (aOR=5.2, 95% CI: 1.0-27.4, p=0.050), additionally, those who were aware of female circumcision were less likely to have had FGC (aOR=0.32, 95% CI: 0.10-0.12, p=0.001).
Conclusion: The awareness of the VAPP law is low, and the prevalence of FGC remains high. There is a need to scale up public health awareness and sensitistion efforts to improve preventive measures against FGC.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Journal is owned, published and copyrighted by the Nigerian Medical Association, River state Branch. The copyright of papers published are vested in the journal and the publisher. In line with our open access policy and the Creative Commons Attribution License policy authors are allowed to share their work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
TNHJ also supports open access archiving of articles published in the journal after three months of publication. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g, in institutional repositories or on their website) within the stated period, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). All requests for permission for open access archiving outside this period should be sent to the editor via email to editor@tnhjph.com.
How to Cite
References
1. WHO WHO. Female genital mutilation [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jun 21]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation
2. Dirisu O, Adetunji A, Adediran M, Obianwu O. A diagnostic assessment of the health system’s response to FGM/C management and prevention in Nigeria. 2020 [cited 2024 Nov 13]; Available from: https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/departments_sbsr-rh/1150/
3. Sanni FO, Sanni EA, Onyeagwaibe C, Ahamuefula T. A retrospective analysis of the trends in the prevalence of female genital mutilation and associated factors among women of reproductive age in Nigeria 2011–2021. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2024;13(8):3084–93.
4. Morlighem C, Visée C, Nnanatu CC. Comparison of FGM prevalence among Nigerian women aged 15–49 years using two household surveys conducted before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health. 2024;;24(1):1866
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19069-6
5. Jurgens E. IOB policy review of the support to and collaboration with UNFPA and UNAIDS. 2017 [cited 2025 Jun 21]; Available from: http://www.estherjurgens.nl/pdf/417%20-%20deelstudie%20-%20Policy%20review%20of%20the%20support%20and%20collaboration%20with%20UNFPA%20and%20UNAIDS.pdf
6. Mac-Feely S. Measuring the Sustainable Development Goal Indicators: An Unprecedented Statistical Challenge [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jun 21]. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2478/jos-2020-0019
7. Miller M. Towards Zero: Understanding the limitations of the UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Program to Eliminate Female Genital Mutilation. 2020 [cited 2025 Jun 21]; Available from: https://phaidra.univie.ac.at/detail/o:1393859.pdf
8. NPC/ICF. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF; 2019 - Google Search. 2018; Available from: https://www.google.com/search?q=National+Population+Commission+%28NPC%29+%5BNigeria%5D%2C+ICF.+Nigeria+Demographic+and+Health+Survey+2018.+Abuja%2C+Nigeria%2C+and+Rockville%2C+Maryland%2C+USA%3A+NPC+and+ICF%3B+2019&source=hp&ei=mDmjYc77Da-GjLsPwMewIA&ifls
9. Nnanatu CC, Fagbamigbe AF, Afuecheta E, Utazi CE. Spatially Varying Intergenerational Changes in the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in Nigeria: Lessons Learnt from a Recent Household Survey. Appl Spatial Analysis. 2023;16(2):703–27.
10. Wilson AM. FGM in Kenya [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2025 Jun 21]. Available from: https://covaw.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Final-Kenya-28TM-Country-Profile-May13.pdf
11. Kandala NB, Komba PN. Mapping and Modelling of the FGM Prevalence. In: Female Genital Mutilation around The World: [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018 [cited 2024 Jun 28]. p. 27–94. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-78007-8_3
12. Kandala NB, Shell-Duncan B. Trends in female genital mutilation/cutting in Senegal: what can we learn from successive household surveys in sub-Saharan African countries? Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):25. -1-69
13. Doucet MH, Pallitto C, Groleau D. Understanding the motivations of health-care providers in performing female genital mutilation: an integrative review of the literature. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):46. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0306-5
14. Kandala NB, Komba PN. Female Genital Mutilation around The World: Analysis of Medical Aspects, Law and Practice [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018 [cited 2024 Nov 11]. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-78007-8
15. Timothy GC. The Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act, 2015: A Beam in Unmasking Violence in Tertiary (Polytechnic) Education in Nigeria. 2022 [cited 2025 Jun 21]; Available from: https://www.seahipublications.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/IJILPS-S-5-2022.pdf
16. Onyemelukwe C. Legislating on violence against women: a critical analysis of Nigeria’s recent Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act, 2015. DePaul J Women Gender & L. 2015;5:i.
17. NDHS. Demographic and Health Survey: Key Indicators Report. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey. 2023;1(1):1–23.
18. Onah CK, Ossai EN, Nwachukwu OM, Nwankwo GE, Mbam HO, Azuogu BN. Factors associated with the practice of and intention to perform female genital mutilation on a female child among married women in Abakaliki Nigeria. BMC Women’s Health. 2023;23(1):376. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02537-3
19. Kpe-Nobana CL, Hart F. Factors influencing the practice of female genital mutilation: health implications in Ahoada West Local Government Area, Rivers State Nigeria. Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences Journal of Scientific Innovations. 2022;3(3):150–7.
20. Ugboma HA, Akani CI, Babatunde S. Prevalence and medicalization of female genital mutilation. Nigerian Journal of medicine: journal of the National Association of Resident Doctors of Nigeria. 2004;13(3):250–3.
21. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). National Nutrition and Health Survey. National Bureau of Statistics. 2018;(September):1–161.
22. Israel GD. Determining sample size. 1-5 [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2024 Nov 23]. Available from: https://www.gjimt.ac.in/web/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/2_Glenn-D.-Israel_Determining-Sample-Size.pdf
23. Orukwowu U, Onyema C. Factors Influencing the Practice of Female Genital Mutilation in Ueken Community, Tai Local Government Area of Rivers State. IPS Journal of Public Health. 2022;1(3):1–6.
24. Udowoima M, Ukpo Q. Law as An Agent of Social Change: A Case Study of Female Genital Mutilation in Nigeria. SSRN Journal [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Jun 21]; Available from: https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3986554
25. Kinsley A, Franklin O. Female genital mutilation/cutting among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) in communities in Imo State, South-East, Nigeria: Prevalence, pattern and determinants. International Research Journal of Public and Environmental Health. 2023;10(2):52.