Pain Sensitivity and Reliability of the Posterior-Anterior Central Vertebral Pressure as a Provocative Test in Lumbar Pain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71637/tnhj.v25i2.1069Keywords:
Low back pain, Posterior-Anterior Central Vertebral Pressure, Pain Sensitivity, ReliabilityAbstract
Background: The posterior-anterior central vertebral pressure (PACVP) is a manual diagnostic test for spinal pain; however, its sensitivity and reliability remain underexplored. This study evaluated the pain sensitivity and reliability of the PACVP as a provocative test in lumbar pain.
Method: This test-retest study involved 76 patients with lumbar pain attending outpatient physiotherapy in a tertiary hospital. Baseline pain-intensity was assessed using a visual analogue scale, while the lowest transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) threshold indicated TENS pain sensitivity. Two experienced physiotherapists assessed the patients' pain-intensity before and after PACVP at initial contact and after 48-hours. Differences in pain-intensity before and after PACVP were recorded as PACVP pain sensitivity. Descriptive statistics summarised data, while intra-class and inter-class correlation coefficients analysed the intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities of PACVP, with precision measures. Pearson correlation coefficient analysed the relationship between variables at p < 0.05.
Results: Intra-rater reliabilities for PACVP were ICC = 0.93 with SEM (0.17), CV (11.9%) and ICC = 0.96 with SEM (0.15), CV (8.80%); while inter-rater reliability was ICC = 0.90 with SEM (0.22), CV (12.5%). Pain-intensity provoked by PACVP was negatively related (p<0.05) to pain sensitivity to TENS, whereas pain sensitivity to PACVP was positively related (p<0.05) to pain sensitivity to TENS.
Conclusion: The PACVP is a reliable test for lumbar pain. Pain-intensity provoked by PACVP is inversely related to pain sensitivity to TENS, while pain sensitivity to PACVP is directly related to pain sensitivity to TENS.
Downloads
References
1.Murray CJL; GBD 2021 Collaborators. Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024; 403(10440): 2259-2262. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00769-4.
2.Wu A, Dong W, Liu S, Cheung JPY, Kwan KYH, Zeng X, et al. The prevalence and years lived with disability caused by low back pain in China, 1990 to 2016: findings from the global burden of disease study 2016. Pain. 2019; 160: 237-245. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001396.
3.Park SC, Kang MS, Yang JH, Kim TH. Assessment and nonsurgical management of low back pain: a narrative review. Korean J Intern Med. 2023; 38: 16-26. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.250.
4.Malik KM, Nelson AM, Chiang TH, Imani F, Khademi SH. The specifics of non-specific low back pain: re-evaluating the current paradigm to improve patient outcomes. Anesth Pain Med. 2022; 12: e131499. doi: 10.5812/aapm-131499.
5.Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017; 389(10070): 736–47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9.
6.Farley T, Stokke J, Goyal K, DeMicco R. Chronic low back pain: history, symptoms, pain mechanisms, and treatment. Life. 2024; 14: 812. doi: 10.3390/life14070812.
7.Will JS, Bury DC, Miller JA. Mechanical low back pain. Am Fam Physician. 2018; 98: 421-428.
8.Maher C, Adams R. Reliability of pain and stiffness assessments in clinical manual lumbar spine examination. Phys Ther. 1994; 74: 801-9; discussion 809-11. doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.9.801.
9.Maitland GD. Maitland’s Vertebral Manipulation. 7th edition. London, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2005.
10.Shah SG, Kage V. Effect of seven sessions of posterior-to-anterior spinal mobilisation versus prone press-ups in non-specific low back pain - randomized clinical trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10: YC10-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/15898.7485.
11.Teslim OA, Olayinka A, Michael E, Adesoji AR, Oluwole AT. Reliability and concurrent validity of bathroom weighing scale and sphygmomanometer in quantifying magnitude of digital postero-anterior spinal pressure. Technol Health Care. 2013; 21: 397-405. doi: 10.3233/THC-130741.
12.Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Childs JD. Lumbar spine segmental mobility assessment: an examination of validity for determining intervention strategies in patients with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 1745-52. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.028.
13.Baig, A.A.M., Ahmed, S.I., Ali, S.S., Rahmani, A., & Siddiqui, F. Role of posterior-anterior vertebral mobilization versus thermotherapy in non-specific lower back pain. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34, 435–439.
14.Björnsdóttir SV, Guðmundsson G, Auðunsson GA, Matthíasson J, Ragnarsdóttir M. Posterior-anterior (PA) pressure Puffin for measuring and treating spinal stiffness: Mechanism and repeatability. Man Ther. 2016; 22: 72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.10.005.
15.Ojoawo AO, Olaogun MO, Odejide SA, Badru AA. Effect of vertical oscillatory pressure on disability of patients with chronic mechanical low back pain using Roland Morris Disability questionnaire. Tanzan J Health Res. 2013; 15: 58-63. doi: 10.4314/thrb.v15i1.9.
16.Egwu MO, Ojeyinka AA, Olaogun MO. The effect of vertical oscillatory pressure (vop) on youths and elderly adult low back pain (lbp) intensity and lumbo-sacral mobility. J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc. 2007; 10: 17-26. doi: 10.1298/jjpta.10.17.
17.Jerez-Mayorga D, Dos Anjos CF, Macedo MC, Fernandes IG, Aedo-Muñoz E, Intelangelo L, Barbosa AC. Instrumental validity and intra/inter-rater reliability of a novel low-cost digital pressure algometer. ??PeerJ. 2020; 8: e10162. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10162.
18.Notermans SL. Measurement of the pain threshold determined by electrical stimulation and its clinical application. I. Method and factors possibly influencing the pain threshold. Neurology. 1966; 16: 1071-86. doi: 10.1212/wnl.16.11.1071.
19.Iyer P, Lee YC. Why It Hurts: The mechanisms of pain in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2021; 47: 229-244. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2020.12.008.
20.Stutts L. Pain Sensitivity. In: Goldstein, S., Naglieri, J.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of child behavior and development. Springer. 2011, Boston, MA. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_2067.
21.Sang CN, Max MB, Gracely RH. Stability and reliability of detection thresholds for human A-Beta and A-delta sensory afferents determined by cutaneous electrical stimulation. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003; 25: 64-73. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00541-9.
22.DeJesus BM, Rodrigues IKL, Azevedo-Santos IF, DeSantana JM. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain-related quantitative sensory tests in chronic musculoskeletal pain and acute experimental pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain. 2023; 24: 1337-1382. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.03.014.
23.Prasad K. Sample size calculation with simple math for clinical researchers. Natl Med J India 2020; 33: 372-374.
24.Price DD, Staud R, Robinson ME. How should we use the visual analogue scale (VAS) in rehabilitation outcomes? II: Visual analogue scales as ratio scales: an alternative to the view of Kersten et al. J Rehabil Med. 2012; 44: 800-1; ??discussion 803-4. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1031.
25.National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III: Body measurements (anthropometry). Https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/53134/cdc_53134_DS1.pdf. Accessed October 18, 2024.
26.Tella BA, Oghumu SN, Gbiri CAO. Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current on tactile acuity of individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain. Neuromodulation. 2022; 25: 1403-1409. doi: 10.1111/ner.13522.
27.Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15: 155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31. Erratum in: J Chiropr Med. 2017; 16: 346. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.10.001.
28.Nijs J, George SZ, Clauw DJ, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Kosek E, Ickmans K, et al. Central sensitisation in chronic pain conditions: latest discoveries and their potential for precision medicine. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021; 3: e383-e392. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00032-1.
29.Bogduk N. Functional anatomy of the spine. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016; 136: 675–688.
30.Shiri R, Solovieva S, Husgafvel-Pursiainen K, Telama R, Yang X, Viikari J, et al. The role of obesity and physical activity in non-specific and radiating low back pain: the Young Finns study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013; 42: 640-50. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2012.09.002.
31.Stokes IA, Gardner-Morse M. Lumbar spinal muscle activation synergies predicted by multi-criteria cost function. J Biomech. 2001; 34: 733-40. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00034-3.
32.Pala ÖO, Yener N, Baş B, Alsaıravan MA, Uysal MF. Assessment of physiotherapists’ sensitivity to palpation pressure. Northwestern Med J. 2024;4(4):213-9. Doi: 10.54307/2024.NWMJ.127.
33.Bhattacharyya A, Hopkinson LD, Nolet PS, Srbely J. The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review. British Journal of Pain. 2023;17(6):579-591. doi:10.1177/20494637231196647.
34.Steinmetz A, Hacke F, Delank KS. Pressure pain thresholds and central sensitization in relation to psychosocial predictors of chronicity in low back pain. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13: 786. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040786.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Saturday Nicholas Oghumu, Eric Chidozie Anyanwu, Ruth Oluwafunmike Nicholas, Kayode Israel Oke
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Journal is owned, published and copyrighted by the Nigerian Medical Association, River state Branch. The copyright of papers published are vested in the journal and the publisher. In line with our open access policy and the Creative Commons Attribution License policy authors are allowed to share their work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
TNHJ also supports open access archiving of articles published in the journal after three months of publication. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g, in institutional repositories or on their website) within the stated period, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). All requests for permission for open access archiving outside this period should be sent to the editor via email to editor@tnhjph.com.
