Sanitation facilities and hygiene practices in a semi-urban community in Rivers State, south-south Nigeria

Authors

  • Best Ordinioha Department of Community Medicine, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
  • Golden Owhonda Department of Community Medicine, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60787/tnhj.v8i1-2.6

Keywords:

Sanitation facility, hygiene practices, Semi- Urban community, Nigeria

Abstract

Background: Water and sanitation projects are synergistic in producing health effects; while there has been massive investment in water projects as part of the effort to achieve the Millennium Development Goal on access to water and sanitation; the same cannot be said for sanitation projects. This study examined the state of sanitation facilities and hygiene behaviour in an oil rich community in the Niger delta region of Nigeria.

Method: The study was carried out in Ogbogu, a small semi-urban community in Rivers State, south-south Nigeria, using a descriptive cross-sectional study design. The data was collected using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire, field observations and focus group discussions. The questionnaire was administered to female heads of households with under-five children; the field observations consisted of direct observations, spot checks and rating checks of sanitation facilities and hygiene behaviour of the respondents; while the focus group discussions were held with executive members of the community's women's association.

Results: Only 68% of the households in the community had access to a sanitation facility. The reasons given for not having a sanitation facility include lack of space (85.92%), and cost (12.68%). Most of the facilities were flush toilets (61.07%), and they formed 87.95% of the 83 facilities found to be in good hygienic condition. Of the respondents with sanitation facility, 28.86% would not allow young children to use the facility. Only 21.36% of the respondents routinely disposed the stool of their children into the sanitation facility; human faeces were consequently found around the house of 40% of the respondents. About 22% of the respondents were found to have the appropriate hand washing behaviour; while the two week period prevalence of diarrhea amongst children less than 36 weeks was 14.09%.

Conclusions: The access to sanitation facility, and hand washing behaviour in the study community were poor. Hygiene education and social marketing of sanitation facilities are hereby advised

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Best Ordinioha, Department of Community Medicine, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Senior Lecturer and Consultant Public Health Physician

Golden Owhonda, Department of Community Medicine, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Consultant Public Health Physician

References

Simpson-Hebert M, Wood S eds. Sanitation Promotion. Geneva. World Health Organization/ Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council (Working Group on Promotion of Sanitation). 1998.

Cairncross S, Carruthers I, Curtis D, Feachem R, Bradley D, Baldwin G. Evaluation for village water supply planning. The Hague: International Reference Centre for Community Water Supply and Sanitation/ John Wiley & Sons; 1991: 75.

Department for International Development (DFID). Guidance manual on water supply and sanitation programmes. London: WELL/ London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.1998.

Esrey S, Potash J, Roberts L, Shiff C. Effects of improved water supply and sanitation on ascariasis, diarrhea, drancunculiasis, hookworm infection, schistosomiasis and trachoma. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1991; 60:609 621

World Health Organization. The World Health Report: 2005: Make Every Mother and Child Count. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2005.

UN Millenium Development Goals Available at: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals. Accessed June 2007

Water Aid Nigeria. Water and Sanitation in Nigeria: A briefing on national policy. Water Aid Nigeria. 2008.

National Population Commission (Nigeria) and ORC Macro. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Calverton, Maryland. 2004: 151 166.

Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC). Water projects: Quenching the people's thirst. Available at http://www.nddc.gov.ng. assessed April, 2009.

Bentley ME, Boot MT, Gittelsohn J, Stallings RY. The use of structured observations in the study of health behaviour: occasional paper 27. The Hague. IRC/ International Water and Sanitation Center/ London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. 1994.

WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific. Health Research Methodology: A guide for training in research methods. Second Edition. Manilla. WHO. 2001.

Billig P, Bendahmane D, Swindale A. Water and sanitation indicators measurement guide. Washington DC. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development. 1999: 7 18.

Araoye MO. Research methodology with statistics for health and social sciences. Ilorin . Nathandex publishers. 2003. 119-120.

Admassu M, Wubshet M, Tilaye T. Sanitary survey in Gondar town. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2003; 3: 215 219.

Banda K, Sarkar R, Gopal S, Govindarajan J, Harijan BB, Jeyakumar MB et al. Water handling, sanitation and defecation practices in rural southern India: a knowledge, attitudes and practices study. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007; 101: 1124 -1130.

Clark R, Gundry SW. The prominence of health in donor policy for water supply and sanitation: a review. J Water Health 2004; 2: 157 169.

Bateman O, Smith S. A comparison of the health effects ofwater and sanitation in urban and rural Guatemala: WASH project field report 352. Arlington, VA. Environmental Health Project. 1991.

Fewtrell L, Kaufmann R, Kay D, Enanoria W, Haller L, Colford J. Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrhoea in less developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2005; 5: 4252.

Curtis V, Cairncross S. Effect of washing hands on diarrhea risk in the community. Lancet infectious Disease 2003; 3: 275 281.

Boot M, Cairncross eds. Actions speaks: The study ofhygiene behaviour in water and sanitation projects. The Hague. International Reference Centre for Community Water Supply and Sanitation/ London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. 1993.

Varley RC, Tarvid J, Chao DN. A reassessment of the cost-effectiveness of water and sanitation interventions in programmes for controlling childhood diarrhoea. Bull World Health Organ 1998; 76: 617-631

Downloads

Published

2015-11-29

How to Cite

Ordinioha, B., & Owhonda, G. (2015). Sanitation facilities and hygiene practices in a semi-urban community in Rivers State, south-south Nigeria. The Nigerian Health Journal, 8(1-2), 10. https://doi.org/10.60787/tnhj.v8i1-2.6
Abtract Views | PDF Download | EPUB Download: 1017 / 79

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.