Acute Effects of Steady-State Generator and Intermittent Traffic Noise on Attention and Short-Term Memory in Nigerian University Students: A Counterbalanced Experimental Study.

Main Article Content

Muhammad-Hadi Folarin Oyerinde
Idris Muhammad Yakubu
Ikemsinachi Teddy Ononogbo
Elvina Oruobu
Paul Chidiebere Onyebuchi

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the acute effects of steady-state and intermittent noise on attention and short-term memory among Nigerian university students.


Methods: A counterbalanced within-subjects experimental design was employed with 40 undergraduate students from UNILORIN, who were exposed to three conditions: quiet control (~35 dB[A]), steady-state noise, and intermittent noise, all calibrated at 70 dB(A). Attention was assessed using the Letter Cancellation Test (LCT), while short-term memory was measured using immediate free recall of ten semantically unrelated words. Linear mixed-effects models adjusting for individual and session-level covariates were applied, with supplementary repeated-measures ANOVA (Analysis of Variance).


Results: Linear mixed-effects models showed no significant deleterious effects of steady-state or intermittent noise on attention or short-term memory compared with the quiet condition. Supplementary repeated-measures ANOVA identified statistical differences in attention scores, but these effects were small and attenuated after covariate adjustment. Stress emerged as a significant negative predictor of both cognitive outcomes, while noise sensitivity showed a positive association with attentional performance. These findings suggest habituation or arousal-related resilience to noise exposure, with stress exerting a stronger influence on cognitive performance than noise itself.


Conclusion: Acute exposure to generator and traffic noise at 70 dB(A) does not significantly impair attention or memory among Nigerian university students. Interventions targeting stress reduction may offer greater cognitive benefits than short-term noise control alone. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Original Articles

Author Biography

Elvina Oruobu, British American Tobacco Company, Nigeria.

  

How to Cite

Oyerinde, M.-H., Yakubu, I. ., Ononogbo, I. ., Oruobu, E., & Onyebuchi, P. . (2026). Acute Effects of Steady-State Generator and Intermittent Traffic Noise on Attention and Short-Term Memory in Nigerian University Students: A Counterbalanced Experimental Study. The Nigerian Health Journal, 26(1), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.71637/tnhj.v26i1.1300

References

1.Souliby A, Mahammedi F. Baddeley and Hitch's Multi-Component Model of Working Memory analytical study. Al-Siraj Mag Educ Community Issues. 2024 Jun 12;8(2):19-32. https://asjp.cerist.dz/index.php/en/article/246370

2.Monteiro R, Tomé D, Neves P, Silva D, Rodrigues MA. The interactive effect of occupational noise on attention and short-term memory: A pilot study. Noise and Health. 2018 Sep-Oct;20(96):190-198. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_3_18.

3.Hammer MS, Fan Y, Hammer SS, Swinburn TK, Weber M, Weinhold D, Neitzel RL. Applying a novel environmental health framework theory (I-ACT) to noise pollution policies in the United States, United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. Journal of environmental planning and management. 2018 Oct 15;61(12):2111-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1385448.

4.Hahad O, Prochaska JH, Daiber A, Muenzel T. Environmental noise‐induced effects on stress hormones, oxidative stress, and vascular dysfunction: Key factors in the relationship between cerebrocardiovascular and psychological

disorders. Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity. 2019;2019(1):4623109. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4623109.

5.Daiber A, Kröller‐Schön S, Frenis K, Oelze M, Kalinovic S, Vujacic‐Mirski K, Kuntic M, Bayo Jimenez MT, Helmstädter J, Steven S, Korac B. Environmental noise induces the release of stress hormones and inflammatory signaling molecules leading to oxidative stress and vascular dysfunction—Signatures of the internal exposome. Biofactors. 2019 Jul;45(4):495-506. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.1506.

6.Clark C, Head J, Haines M, van Kamp I, van Kempen E, Stansfeld SA. A meta-analysis of the association of aircraft noise at school on children's reading comprehension and psychological health for use in health impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2021 Aug 1;76:101646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101646

7.Peng P, Barnes M, Wang C, Wang W, Li S, Swanson HL, Dardick W, Tao S. A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychological bulletin. 2018 Jan;144(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000124

8.Kassaw C, Demareva V. Psychosocial and cognitive predictors of academic achievement among higher education students in Southern Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2025 Nov 6;20(11):e0335968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335968. PMID: 41196871; PMCID: PMC12591494.

9.Molnár, G., & Kocsis, Á. (2023). Cognitive and non-cognitive predictors of academic success in higher education: a large-scale longitudinal study. Studies in Higher Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2271513

10.Li X, AlWadi BM, Ahmad A, Dukhaykh S, Khan I. Igniting success: how growth mindset fuels academic achievement through self-belief and strategic effort. BMC Nurs. 2025 Dec 22;24(1):1507. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-04237-9. PMID: 41430222; PMCID: PMC12751792.

11.Spencer H. The principles of psychology. InScientific Methodology in Nineteenth Century Britain 2025 Sep 25 (pp. 163-178). Routledge.

12.Agbo COA. Noise Pollution in Nigeria’s Institutions of Higher Learning: A Review. J. Eng. Res. Rep. [Internet]. 2020 Oct. 30;18(1):8-21. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2020/v18i117198.

13.Agaja TM, Akande GP. Impact of noise pollution on the academic performance of students in the university of Ilorin’s learning environment, Nigeria. FUDMA J Earth Environ Sci. 2024 Dec. 31;1(2):42-57. https://doi.org/10.33003/jees.2024.0102/05.

14.Ayodeji Olawumi B, Abubakar I. Perception of Students on Noise Level Influence of Selected Evening Reading Classes in Umaru Ali Shinkafi Polytechnic, Sokoto. GJBE [Internet]. 2024 Sep. 2;6(1):29-38. https://gjbeses.org/ses-journal/index.php/gjbe/article/view/45.

15.NESREA. (2009). National Environmental (Noise Standards and Control) Regulations, 2009. Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette.

16.Francis A, Sani S, Abubakar A. Evaluation of noise levels in Ahmadu Bello University main campus, Samaru, Zaria, Nigeria. J Occup Saf Environ Health. 2023;5(1):46-55. https://sosehnigeria.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/2023_PAPER-04.pdf

17.Dzhambov AM. Noise sensitivity: a neurophenomenological perspective. Medical hypotheses. 2015 Nov 1;85(5):650-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2015.08.006

18.Sörqvist P. On interpretation and task selection in studies on the effects of noise on cognitive performance. Frontiers in psychology. 2014 Oct 30;5:1249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01249

19.Schlittmeier SJ, Feil A, Liebl A, Hellbr Ck JR. The impact of road traffic noise on cognitive performance in attention-based tasks depends on noise level even within moderate-level ranges. Noise Health. 2015 May-Jun;17(76):148-57. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.155845.

20.Brink M, Schäffer B, Vienneau D, Foraster M, Pieren R, Eze IC, Cajochen C, Probst-Hensch N, Röösli M, Wunderli JM. A survey on exposure-response relationships for road, rail, and aircraft noise annoyance: Differences between continuous and intermittent noise. Environment international. 2019 Apr 1;125:277-90.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.043

21.Brocolini L, Parizet E, Chevret P. Effect of masking noise on cognitive performance and annoyance in open plan offices. Applied acoustics. 2016 Dec 15;114:44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.07.012

22.Yerkes RM, Dodson JD. The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit-Formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503.

23.Leist L, Lachmann T, Klatte M. Impact of irrelevant speech and non-speech sounds on serial recall of verbal and spatial items in children and adults. Scientific reports. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):1951. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85855-w

24.Meteyard L, Davies RA. Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science. Journal of Memory and Language. 2020 Jun 1;112:104092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104092

25.Szalma JL, Hancock PA. Noise effects on human performance: a meta-analytic synthesis. Psychol Bull. 2011 Jul;137(4):682-707. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023987