Occupational Noise Exposure, Hearing Conservation Programs, and Tinnitus Outcomes in Industrial Communities: A Mixed-Methods Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Tinnitus remains under-recognized as a distinct occupational health concern with profound psychosocial ramifications in industrial communities, despite existing regulatory frameworks globally. Significant gaps persist in the implementation of tinnitus-responsive hearing conservation programs (HCPs), especially in resource-limited industrial settings. The unique lived experiences of workers are often marginalized in occupational discourse, highlighting the need for comprehensive understanding of the relationship between occupational noise exposure, hearing conservation programs, and tinnitus outcomes.
Methods: This review utilized a mixed-methods framework, integrating quantitative
epidemiological data with qualitative narratives from affected workers and occupational health professionals. Relevant studies were identified through a targeted search of peer-reviewed journals, international health databases, and institutional reports, focusing on industrial noise exposure and tinnitus outcomes. Articles were selected based on relevance, recency, and inclusion of African or global industrial contexts. The review categorizes findings into epidemiology, risk factors, conservation program effectiveness, psychosocial impacts, and management strategies.
Results: The review critically synthesizes existing literature demonstrating the complex relationship between occupational noise exposure and tinnitus in industrial settings. Findings reveal substantial evidence across multiple categories including epidemiological patterns, risk factor identification, effectiveness of current hearing conservation programs, psychosocial impacts on workers, and existing management strategies.
Conclusion: This article contributes novel insights to the field by consolidating fragmented evidence and emphasizing human-centered policy frameworks. The review calls for integrative intervention models combining technical, clinical, and psychosocial strategies to address tinnitus in occupational settings.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Journal is owned, published and copyrighted by the Nigerian Medical Association, River state Branch. The copyright of papers published are vested in the journal and the publisher. In line with our open access policy and the Creative Commons Attribution License policy authors are allowed to share their work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
TNHJ also supports open access archiving of articles published in the journal after three months of publication. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g, in institutional repositories or on their website) within the stated period, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). All requests for permission for open access archiving outside this period should be sent to the editor via email to editor@tnhjph.com.
How to Cite
References
1.World Health Organization. World report on hearing. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
2.Bhatt JM, Lin HW, Bhattacharyya N. Prevalence, severity, exposures, and treatment patterns of tinnitus in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(10):959-65.
3.Donato SC, Matuoka JY, Yamashita CC, Salvetti MG. Systematic review of interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss - a follow-up. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2021;55:e2020057.
4.Rabinowitz PM, Galusha D, Slade MD, Dixon-Ernst C, Cullen MR. Audiogram notches in noise-exposed workers. Ear Hear. 2006;27(6):742-50.
5.Masterson EA, Bushnell PT, Themann CL, Morata TC. Hearing impairment among noise-exposed workers — United States, 2003–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(15):389-94.
6.Nelson DI, Nelson RY, Concha-Barrientos M, Fingerhut M. The global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48(6):446-58.
7.Masterson EA, Themann CL, Calvert GM. Prevalence of hearing loss among noise-exposed workers within the health care and social assistance sector, 2003 to 2012. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60(4):350-6.
8.Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 2014;383(9925):1325-32.
9.Frederiksen TW, Ramlau-Hansen CH, Stokholm ZA, Grynderup MB, Hansen ÅM, Lund SP, et al. Occupational noise exposure, psychosocial working conditions and the risk of tinnitus. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017;90(2):217-25.
10.Zhao YM, Qiu W, Zeng L, Chen SS, Cheng XR, Davis RI, et al. Application of the kurtosis statistic to the evaluation of the risk of hearing loss in workers exposed to high-level complex noise. Ear Hear. 2010;31(4):527-32.
11.Campo P, Morata TC, Hong O. Chemical exposure and hearing loss. Dis Mon. 2013;59(4):119-38.
12.Mahboubi H, Zardouz S, Oliaei S, Pan D, Bazargan M, Djalilian HR. Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: integration of occupational and recreational exposures. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(11):2706-11.
13.Kim KS, Kim MJ, Roh JH, Kwon HJ, Kim J. Relationship between occupational noise and vibration exposure and occurrence of tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2018;73(3):188-98.
14.National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Criteria for a recommended standard: occupational noise exposure, revised criteria. Cincinnati: NIOSH; 2022.
15.Rabinowitz PM, Galusha D, Dixon-Ernst C, Slade MD, Cullen MR. Do ambient noise exposure levels predict hearing loss in a modern industrial cohort? Occup Environ Med. 2007;64(1):53-9.
16.Sayler SK, Rabinowitz PM, Cantley LF, Galusha D, Neitzel RL. Costs and effectiveness of hearing conservation programs at 14 US metal manufacturing facilities. Int J Audiol. 2018;57(sup1):S3-S11.
17.Verbeek JH, Kateman E, Morata TC, Dreschler WA, Mischke C. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(S2):S84-S96.
18.Neitzel R, Seixas N, Goldman B, Daniell W. Contributions of non-occupational activities to total noise exposure of construction workers. Ann Occup Hyg. 2004;48(5):463-73.
19.Lusk SL, Hong OS, Ronis DL, Eakin BL, Kerr MJ, Early MR. Effectiveness of an intervention to increase construction workers’ use of hearing protection. Hum Factors. 1999;41(3):487-94.
20.Hong O, Kerr MJ, Poling GL, Dhar S. Understanding and preventing noise-induced hearing loss. Dis Mon. 2013;59(4):110-8.
21.Seixas NS, Neitzel R, Stover B, Sheppard L, Feeney P, Mills D, et al. 10-year prospective study of noise exposure and hearing damage among construction workers. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69(9):643-50.
22.Guest H, Munro KJ, Prendergast G, Millman RE, Plack CJ. Impaired speech perception in noise with a normal audiogram: no evidence for cochlear synaptopathy and no relation to lifetime noise exposure. Hear Res. 2018;364:142-51.
23.Guest H, Munro KJ, Prendergast G, Howe S, Plack CJ. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: relation to noise exposure but no evidence for cochlear synaptopathy. Hear Res. 2017;344:265-74.
24.Basner M, Brink M, Bristow A, de Kluizenaar Y, Finegold L, Hong J, et al. ICBEN review of research on the biological effects of noise 2011–2014. Noise Health. 2015;17(75):57-82.
25.Hasson D, Theorell T, Liljeholm-Johansson Y, Canlon B. Psychosocial and physiological correlates of self-reported hearing problems in male and female musicians in symphony orchestras. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009;74(2):93-100.
26.Morata TC, Themann CL, Randolph RF, Verbsky BL, Byrne DC, Reeves ER. Working in noise with a hearing loss: perceptions from workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers. Ear Hear. 2005;26(6):529-45.
27.Hobson J, Chisholm E, El Refaie A. Sound therapy (masking) in the management of tinnitus in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD006371.
28.Cima RF, Maes IH, Joore MA, et al. Specialised treatment based on cognitive behaviour therapy versus usual care for tinnitus: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9830):1951-9.
29.Hoare DJ, Kowalkowski VL, Kang S, Hall DA. Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials examining tinnitus management. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(7):1555-64.
30.Hoare DJ, Edmondson-Jones M, Sereda M, Akeroyd MA, Hall D. Amplification with hearing aids for patients with tinnitus and co-existing hearing loss. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:CD010151.
31.Tunkel DE, Bauer CA, Sun GH, et al. Clinical practice guideline: tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(2 Suppl):S1-40.
32.Morata TC, Themann CL, Randolph RF, Verbsky BL, Byrne DC, Reeves ER. Working in noise with a hearing loss: perceptions from workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers. Ear Hear. 2005;26(6):529-45.