Socio-Demographic Determinants of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in Rural and Urban Communities in Rivers State: An Analytical Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey

Authors

  • Adeyemo CU School of Public Health, UNIPORT, Nigeria
  • Nwadiuto AA Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60787/tnhj.v23i2.634

Keywords:

Sexual and gender-based violence, social, cultural, Rivers state

Abstract

Background: Sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) is a widespread public health challenge impacting negatively on the victims. This study was aimed at assessing the socio-demographic determinants of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in rural and urban communities in Rivers State.

Method: A total of 746 consenting respondents, 376 rural and 370 urban residents were recruited using a multi-stage sampling technique. Participants were between 15-35 years. Pretested semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire adapted from the WHO Violence against Women Instrument was used. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the determinants of SGBV in rural and urban residents. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results: Respondents were 343(46%) males and 403(54%) females with a mean age of 23.88±6.14 years from 4 communities. Among study respondents who are resident in rural areas, co-habiting respondents showed higher odds of SGBV compared to those single (OR=10.105, p=0.024). The odd of physical violence was less in female than male rural residents (OR=0.518, p=0.006), while the odd of emotional/psychological violence was higher in rural residents who practice traditional religion compared to the Christians (OR=11.797, p=0.020).  Rural residents practicing traditional religion had higher odds of socio-economic violence than Christians (OR=15.265, p=0.009). The odd of sexual violence among female urban residents was less than the odd of sexual violence among male urban residents (OR=0.542, p=0.006). (Table 3).

Conclusion: The socio-demographic determinants of SGBV differ between rural and urban residents, intervention programs should be designed cognizant of differences in socio-demographic determinants between settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jansen HAFM, Watts C, Ellsberg M, Heise L, García-Moreno C. Interviewer Training in the WHO Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence. Violence Against Women [Internet]. 2004;10(7):831–49. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801204265554.

WHO. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence [Internet]. Penny H, editor. Geneva 27, Switzerland: WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland; 2013. 68–70 p. Available from: www.who.int.

Fawole OI, Balogun OD, Olaleye O. Experience of gender-based violence to students in public and private secondary schools in Ilorin, Nigeria. Ghana Med J [Internet]. 2018 Jun;52(2):66–73. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30662077.

Jewkes R, Fulu E, Tabassam Naved R, Chirwa E, Dunkle K, Haardörfer R, et al. Women’s and men’s reports of past-year prevalence of intimate partner violence and rape and women’s risk factors for intimate partner violence: A multicountry cross-sectional study in Asia and the Pacific. PLoS Med. 2017 Sep 1;14(9).

Perrin N, Marsh M, Clough A, Desgroppes A, Yope Phanuel C, Abdi A, et al. Social norms and beliefs about gender based violence scale: A measure for use with gender based violence prevention programs in low-resource and humanitarian settings. Confl Health. 2019 Mar 8;13(1).

Kalra G, Gupta S, Bhugra D. Sexual variation in India: A view from the west. Indian J Psychiatry [Internet]. 2010 Jan;52(Suppl 1):S264–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21836691

Palermo T, Bleck J, Peterman A. Tip of the iceberg: reporting and gender-based violence in developing countries. Am J Epidemiol [Internet]. 2013/12/12. 2014 Mar 1;179(5):602–12. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24335278

Anca-Ruxandra P, Dariusz G, Ellie K. Gender matters A manual on addressing gender-based violence aff ecting young people. Second edi. Anca-Ruxandra P, Dariusz G, Ellie K, editors. Vol. 2, Council of Europe. France: Council of Europe; 2019. 1–218 p.

Ajah LO, Iyoke CA, Nkwo PO, Nwakoby B, Ezeonu P. Comparison of domestic violence against women in urban versus rural areas of southeast Nigeria. Int J Womens Health [Internet]. 2014 Oct 8;6:865–72. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25336992

Alkan Ö, Özar Ş, Ünver Ş. Economic violence against women: A case in Turkey. Zhang S, editor. PLoS One

[Internet]. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0248630. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248630

Ajah LO, Iyoke CA, Nkwo PO, Nwakoby B, EzeonuP. Comparison of domestic violence against women in urban versus rural areas of southeast Nigeria. Int J Womens Health. 2014;6(October):865–72.

Lampard R. Stated Reasons for Relationship Dissolution in Britain: Marriage and Cohabitation Compared. Eur Sociol Rev [Internet]. 2013;30(3):315–28. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/esr/jct034

Heimdal KR, Houseknecht SK. Cohabiting and Married Couples’ Income Organization: Approaches in Sweden and the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family [Internet]. 2003;65(3):525–38. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00525.x

Magdol L, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Silva PA. Hitting Without a License: Testing Explanations for Differences in Partner Abuse between Young Adult Daters and Cohabitors. J Marriage Fam [Internet]. 1998;60(1):41. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353440

Caetano R, Field CA, Ramisetty-Mikler S, McGrath C. The 5-Year Course of Intimate Partner Violence Among White, Black, and Hispanic Couples in the United States. J Interpers Violence [Internet]. 2005;20(9):1039–57. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260505277783

Herrera VM, Wiersma JD, Cleveland HH. The Influence of Individual and Partner Characteristics on the Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence in Young Adult Relationships. J Youth Adolesc [Internet]. 2007;37(3):284–96. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9249-4

Cercone JJ, Beach SRH, Arias I. Gender Symmetry in Dating Intimate Partner Violence: Does Similar Behavior Imply Similar Constructs? Violence Vict [Internet]. 2005;20(2):207–18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2005.20.2.207

Straus MA. Prevalence of Violence Against Dating Partners by Male and Female University Students Worldwide. Violence Against Women [Internet]. 2004;10(7):790–811. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801204265552

Muassomah M, Abdullah I, Istiadah I, MujahidinA, Masnawi N, Sohrah S. Believe in Literature: Character Education for Indonesia’s Youth. Universal Journal of Educational Research [Internet]. 2020 Jun;8(6):2223–31. Available from: http://www.hrpub.org/journals/article_info.php?aid=9272

Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ. Prevalence Rates of Male and Female Sexual Violence Perpetrators in a National Sample of Adolescents. JAMA Pediatr [Internet]. 2013;167(12):1125. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2629

Novšak R, Mandelj TR, SimoničB. Therapeutic Implications of Religious-Related Emotional Abuse. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma [Internet]. 2012;21(1):31–44. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2011.627914

Downloads

Published

2023-07-10

How to Cite

Adeyemo, C., & AA, N. (2023). Socio-Demographic Determinants of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in Rural and Urban Communities in Rivers State: An Analytical Comparative Cross-Sectional Survey. The Nigerian Health Journal, 23(2), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.60787/tnhj.v23i2.634

Issue

Section

Original Articles
Abtract Views | PDF Download | EPUB Download: 384 / 142

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.