Perception of Labour Pain Among Parturients at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Southern-Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60787/tnhj.v19i1.362Abstract
Background: Labour pain is the result of a complex and subjective interaction of multiple physiologic and psychosocial factors on a woman's individual interpretation of labour stimuli but little data exist in the South-southern part of Nigeria regarding pain perception and relief in labour, despite its obvious advantages.
Objective: To evaluate the perception of labour pains by parturient at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH). We also sought to determine the adequacy of analgesia administered to parturients at UPTH.
Methods: These subjects were administered a structured questionnaire to obtain their demographic information. Their perception of labour pain and adequacy of analgesia were objectively evaluated pre- and post-vaginal delivery using the visual analogue scale (VAS).
Results: Majority (75%) of the respondents perceived labour pains as severe, 23% perceived it as moderate, while 1.7% perceived labour pains as mild. Thirty-two percent of the respondents received counselling during the antenatal period on the nature of labour pains and on the availability of intra-partum analgesia. However, 84.4% of those counselled perceived labour pains as severe, while 71.1% of those not counselled perceived it as severe. Two hundred and four (68%) of the parturients received some form of analgesia, of which majority was intramuscular pentazocine with only 5.9% expressing satisfaction with the adequacy of analgesia.
Conclusion: Most of the partruients perceived labour as a very painful process. The nulliparous and primiparous were more likely to feel more intense pain than the multiparous parturient. The adequacy of analgesia was however grossly inadequate with only 5.9% expressing satisfaction.
Downloads
References
Cheek TG, Gutsche BB, Gaiser RR, Chestnut DH. Obstetric anesthesia. Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby 1999; 320-35.
Reynolds F. Pain relief in labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97(Suppl): 757-759.
Okeke CI, Merah NA, Cole SU, Osibogu A. Knowledge and perception of obstetric analgesia among parturients at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Niger Postgrad Med Journal 2005; 12: 258-261.
Campbel DC. Parenteral opioids for labour analgesia. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 46(3): 616-622.
Crowhurst JA. Analgesia and anaesthesia. Edmonds DK (Ed) In: Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 7th Edition; 2007:53-54.
Kuti O, Faponle AF. Perception of labour pain among the Yoruba ethnic group in Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 26(4): 332-334.
Connel-Price J, Evans JB, Hong D. The development and validation of a dynamic model to account for the progress of labour in the assessment of pain. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 2004; 83(5): 415-424.
Campbell CM, Edwards RR. Ethnic differences in pain and pain management. Pain Manag. 2012; 2(3): 219–230. doi:10.2217/pmt.12.7.
Oladokun A, Eyelade O, Marhason-Bello I, Fadare O, Akinyemi J, et al. Awareness and desirability of labour epidural analgesia: A survey of Nigerian women. Int J Obstet Anaesth 2009; 18(1): 38-42.
Olayemi O, Aimakhu CO, Akinyemi OA. The influence of westernization on pain perception in labour among parturients at the University College Hospital Ibadan. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006; 4: 329-331.
Olayemi O, Aimakhu CO, Udoh ES. Attitudes of patients to obstetric analgesia at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 1: 38-40.
Revil SI, Robins JO, Rosen M. The reliability of a linear analogue scale for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 1976; 31: 1191-1198.
Myles PS, Ttoedel S. The pain visual scale: Is it linear or non-linear? Anaesth Analg1999; 89: 517-520.
Ludington E, Dexter F. Statistical analysis of total labour pain using the Visual Analogue Scale and application to studies of analgesic effectiveness during childbirth. Anaesth Analg 1998; 87; 723-727.
Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: What is moderate pain in millimeters? Pain 1997; 72: 95-97.
Size M, Soyannwo OA, Justins DM. Pain management in developing countries. Anaesthesia, 2007; 62 (Suppl. 1): 38–43.
Fortescue C, Wee MYK. Analgesia in labour: non-regional techniques. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain. 2005. 5(1): 219-223.
Famewo CE. Lectures in anaesthesia and intensive care for medical students and practitioner. Third Edition. Lovemost Printers Ltd. Ibadan. 2004: 84.
Bamigboye AA, Holfmeyr GJ. Caesarean section wound infiltration. SAMJ. 2010. 100(5): 313-317.
Global year against pain in women, real women, real pain. Obstetric pain. www.iasp.com.
Flavia A, Renato P, Adriana SOM, Leila K, Isabella CC, Melania MRA. Combined spinal epidural analgesia and non-pharmacological methods of pain relief during normal childbirth and maternal satisfaction: a randomised clinical trial. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2012. 58(1): 112-117.
Fields H. Depression and pain: a neurobiological model. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1991;4(1):83–92
Long J, Yue Y. Patient controlled intravenous analgesic with tramadol for labour pain relief. Chin Med J (Engl) 2003; 116: 1752-5.
Iliadou M. Labour pain and pharmacological pain relief practice points. Health Sci J. 2009. 3(4): 197-201.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Nigerian Health Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal is owned, published and copyrighted by the Nigerian Medical Association, River state Branch. The copyright of papers published are vested in the journal and the publisher. In line with our open access policy and the Creative Commons Attribution License policy authors are allowed to share their work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
TNHJ also supports open access archiving of articles published in the journal after three months of publication. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g, in institutional repositories or on their website) within the stated period, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). All requests for permission for open access archiving outside this period should be sent to the editor via email to editor@tnhjph.com.
