Study of the Lumbosacral Angles of Males in Port Harcourt, South- South, Nigeria

Authors

  • Cecil Maduforo Department of Radiology, College Of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt
  • Obabo West Department of Radiology, College Of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt
  • Nelson Nwankwo Department of Radiology, College Of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt
  • Regina Onwuchekwa Department of Radiology, College Of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt
  • Uriah Stephen Etawo Department of Surgery, College Of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt
  • David Ogbulu Department of Anatomy College Of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60787/tnhj.v12i1.83

Keywords:

Lumbosacral angles, Males, Reference Values, Nigeria

Abstract

Background: This study was carried out to evaluate the lumbosacral angles of males in the south south geopolitical region of Nigeria in the age group.

Methods: A total of 100 lumbosacral lateral radiographs of normal from subjects South South geopolitical region of Nigeria taken in the department of Radiology, UPTH were evaluated. The lumbosacral angles were measured using Ferguson's method.

Results: The mean lumbosacral angle in the sample population is 36.T+/- 9.41o.The lumbosacral angle was found to increase with age up to a maximum in the age group of 36-40years.It remains fairly constant there after until the seventh decade.

Conclusion: The normal range of lumbosacral angles in Nigerians of South-South geopolitical zone is demonstrated and it does not increase significantly after the age 36-40years

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ferguson AB clinical and roentgen interpretation oflumbosacral spine. Radiology. 1934;22:548-558

Meshan I. Farra- Meshan RM.(ed ) Atlas of Normal Radiographic Anatomy 2nd edition. Saunders Company Philadelphia.1985:416-419.

Abitbol MM. Evolution of the lumbosacral angle. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1987; 72:361-372

Davis GG. Lumbosacral pains considered anatomically. Am J Orth Surg 1917;15:803-8065.Ghormley RK. Etiologic study of back pain Radiology .1958; 70:649-660

Dubousset J. Treatment of spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis in children and adolescents. Clin Ortho. 1997;37:77-85

Mitchell GAG. Lumbosacral Junction. J Bone J surg Am. 1934;16:233-254

Lusted LB, Keats TE. Atlas of Roentgenographic Measurement. Second editon. Year Book publishers, Inc Chicago. 1967;pp 113-114

Meshan I Ferrar-Meshan Rm. Important aspects in roentgen study of normal lumbosacral spine .Radiology. 1958;637-648

Ferguson AB. Roentgen Diagnosis of the extremities and spine.Second edition Paul B Hoeber inc, New York, 1949. Pp382-383

Friedman P S . Evaluation of dynamics law back pain- Page 24Pennsylvania Med J 1954;57:143-147

Splithoff CA. Lumboscral junction; roentgenographic comparison of patients with and without back aches. JAMA. 1953;152: 1610-1613

Van Lackum HL. Lumboacral region. JAMA. 1924;82:1109-1114

Williams PC. The lumbosacral spine,First edition, McGraw-Hill book company, inc New York. 1965.pp81,114-121,141-143

Measurement of the normal lumbosacral angle. Monthly bulletin of Department of Radiology University of Virginia school of medicine Charlottesville,Virgina 1123.

Shane TR,Cuong TB.The horizontal sacrum as an indicator of the tethered cord in spina bifida aperta and occulta. Neurosury Focus. 2007; 23:23-30Maduforo C.O, et al — Lumbosacral angles in MalesThe Nigerian Health Journal, Vol. 12, No 1, January - March, 2012

Downloads

Published

2015-12-09

How to Cite

Maduforo, C., West, O., Nwankwo, N., Onwuchekwa, R., Etawo, U. S., & Ogbulu, D. (2015). Study of the Lumbosacral Angles of Males in Port Harcourt, South- South, Nigeria. The Nigerian Health Journal, 12(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.60787/tnhj.v12i1.83
Abtract Views | PDF Download | EPUB Download: 866 / 60